Evaluating Your Sources
How can you tell if your resources, web or otherwise, is an authoritative source? Use these tips to find out.
Check for bias
-
Does the author or publisher have political leanings or religious views that could affect objectivity?
-
Is the author or publisher associated with a special-interest group, such as Greenpeace or the National Rifle Association, that might promote one side of an issue?
-
Are alternative views presented and addressed? How fairly does the author treat opposing views?
-
Does the author’s language show signs of bias?
From dianehacker.com
Is my web site authoritative?
- Dissect the URL
The URL can tell you who published the web site. This guide by Beth Brin can help you determine the authority of a web site based on the URL. http://library.boisestate.edu/Reference/BBRIN/url.htm
- Find the author
- What is the purpose of the web site?
- Is there a company sponsor?
- Is the web site current?
Links for More Information
Evaluating Internet Research Sources by Robert Harris http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm This site has tips on evaluating resources including this helpful checklist:
Summary of The CARS Checklist for Research Source Evaluation
|
Credibility
|
trustworthy source, author’s credentials, evidence of quality control, known or respected authority, organizational support. Goal: an authoritative source, a source that supplies some good evidence that allows you to trust it. |
|
Accuracy
|
up to date, factual, detailed, exact, comprehensive, audience and purpose reflect intentions of completeness and accuracy. Goal: a source that is correct today (not yesterday), a source that gives the whole truth. |
|
Reasonableness
|
fair, balanced, objective, reasoned, no conflict of interest, absence of fallacies or slanted tone. Goal: a source that engages the subject thoughtfully and reasonably, concerned with the truth. |
|
Support
|
listed sources, contact information, available corroboration, claims supported, documentation supplied. Goal: a source that provides convincing evidence for the claims made, a source you can triangulate (find at least two other sources that support it). |
Your Librarian |
Description
Loading content... please wait






Loading content... please wait